Design Thinking in 
Healthcare: 
Developing Patient-Centred 
Communication Materials for 
Breast Cancer Detection 
 
 
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 
 
by 
 
Corrine Ellsworth Beaumont, MFA 
 
 
School of Design, Craft & Visual Arts  
Faculty of Design, Media & Management 
 
Buckinghamshire New University 
Brunel University 
 
June 2011 
Design Thinking & Breast Cancer: Visualising a Patient-centred Detection Process 
  
 
 
 
For Grandma Kohntopp, 
Grandma Beth and Suzanne 
 
 
Abstract 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Acknowledgements
  
Author?s Declaration 
 
Table of Contents



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
List of Figures 
Note: Unless otherwise stated, images are by the author, Corrine Beaumont. 
Chapter 1 (no figures) 
 
Chapter 2 
 
Chapter 3 
 
Chapter 4 
Chapter 5 
Chapter 6 

Chapter 7 


Chapter 8 


 
 
 
 
1.  Introduction 
 
Chapter One: Introduction      2 
[1.1]  Overview of research aims and objectives  
 
Research aim To advance understanding of the information, knowledge, skills, 
methodology and values deployed by graphic designers and health 
educators when making decisions, particularly on health communication 
materials such as with the topic of breast cancer detection 
Key audiences Breast Cancer Health Educators 
Breast Health Providers & Organisations 
Graphic Designers 
Design Educators 
Design Researchers 
Breast Cancer Screening Patients (not patients who have been 
diagnosed) 
 
Purposes of 
design 
projects  
To illustrate the development of communication concepts as part of 
design and research activity  
 
To have a set of communications to test with small audiences 
 
To document the design journey, and visually articulate proposed 
solutions to problems discovered in the research 
 
To reveal and understand practical problems that would not present 
themselves in theoretical situations 
Contribution 
to design 
portfolio 
 
Guidelines for international communication for breast screening visuals 
 
A set of printed materials (posters and a leaflet) to illustrate the 
guidelines 
 
A fully functional prototype of a breast screening website 
Additional 
sources of 
primary data 
Interviews with health educators, health practitioners, patients and 
oncologists 
 
Surveys on breast cancer awareness and public interpretation of design 
work 
 
Personal experiences of the screening process 
 
Testing of prototypes with users 
 
Pilot studies of groups from different parts of the world using the 
materials developed in this thesis 
Chapter One: Introduction      3 
[1.2]  Background to the research project 
Chapter One: Introduction      4 
Chapter One: Introduction      5 
[1.3]  Unique contributions to research 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
Chapter One: Introduction      6 
 
 
 
[1.4]  Working definitions of design for this thesis 
Chapter One: Introduction      7 
Chapter One: Introduction      8 
[1.5]  Overview of research methods used 
Chapter One: Introduction      9 
Chapter One: Introduction      10 
[1.6]  Ethics
  
 
 
 
 
 
7. 
 
 
 
Chapter One: Introduction      11 
[1.7]  Format of the literature review  
 
 
Chapter One: Introduction      12 
[1.8]  Limitation of the research 
[1.9]  Thesis structure and chapters in brief 
Chapter One: Introduction      13 
 
 
 
2.  Literature Review: 
Breast Cancer Detection and 
Communication in Context 
 
 
 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      15 
[2.1]  Worldwide Context of Breast Cancer and Urgency for 
Detection and Education 
Figure 2.1. The number of new breast cancer cases occurring worldwide, per 100,000 persons (year 
2000 estimate). This map illustrates the rates of breast cancer worldwide. Countries in pink have the 
highest incidence rates, which include the USA, Canada, and the UK. Based on a diagram by (Ferlay, 
Bray, Pisani, & Parkin, 2001). Illustration by Author. 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      16 
? 
? 
STATISTICS OF BREAST CANCER (PER-DAY) 
 
 
 
Table 2.1. Statistics of breast cancer on a per-day basis show how breast cancer deaths could be 
decreased through screening and education programmes (American Cancer Society, 2009; CRUK, May 
2009; NCI, 2009; WHO, 2009). 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      17 
Figure 2.2. The survival rate of breast cancer is determined according to its stage at diagnosis. This 
chart shows the detection rates for each stage, and its corresponding survival rate for that stage. This 
chart is based on information from the National Cancer Institute Report (NCI, 2009). Illustration by 
Author. 
 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      18 
[2.2]  Health Literacy and Patient Engagement 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      19 
[2.3]  Literacy Impact on Engagement in Breast Cancer Screening 
[2.3.1]  Patient-practioner communication 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      20 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      21 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      22 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      23 
[2.4]  Connection between Literacy, Engagement and Design 
 
 
 
 
[2.4.1]  Literature review on the design of communication aids in healthcare 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      24 
[2.4.1.1]  Studies on visuals in patient materials 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      25 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      26 
[2.4.1.2]  Houts study on visuals and patient recall 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      27 
Figure 2.3. 'Examples of simple and complex pictographs' (Houts, Witmer, Egeth, Loscalzo, & Zabora, 
2001, p. 238). These figures show the different types of pictographs categorised by Houts et al, 
according to complexity of the message, rather than their visual complexity. 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      28 
Figure 2.4. This is an example of visuals that are categorised by their visual complexity or simplicity. 
The image on the left is from the Houts study, the image on the right is from the AIGA International 
Symbols set (http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/symbol-signs). 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      29 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      30 
[2.4.2]  Information prescriptions 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      31 
[2.4.2.1]  SPARC innovation program  
 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      32 
Figure 2.5. SPARC designers work with clinicians and patients to develop iterative prototypes for 
patient engagement (Salter, 2006). 
 
 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      33 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      34 
Figure 2.6. First iteration of SPARC decision aid. The metformin card shown as an example of the 
?baseball card? prototype. The full set of cards included one card for each medication (Breslin, 
Mullana, & Montori, 2008, p. 467).  
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      35 
Figure 2.7. Second iteration of SPARC decision aid. The metformin card is shown as an example of the 
?narrative card? prototype. The full set of cards included one for each medication (Breslin, Mullana, & 
Montori, 2008, p. 468). Visuals were not included in the early versions of the decision aid. 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      36 
Figure 2.8. The SPARC cards were designed to stack in the user?s hand, making it easier for patients 
to understand their options in a way that unfolded to new levels of detail, rather than be presented all 
at once (Breslin, Mullana, & Montori, 2008). 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      37 
Figure 2.9. A patient holds the discussion aid during a conversation with her physician (Mayo Research 
KER Unit, 2009).  
Figure 2.10. When the SPARC cards were arranged horizontally, it made it visually simple to compare 
the pros and cons of medication, as well as prioritise what factors were most important for them 
(Breslin, Mullana, & Montori, 2008). 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      38 
Figure 2.11. This final set of cards were designed by SPARC to help patients discuss and decide 
treatment plans with their physician, and include various visual techniques for explaining the side-
 effects (Breslin, Mullana, & Montori, 2008). 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      39 
Chapter Two: Literature Review & Context      40 
[2.5]  Summary 
 
 
 
 
3.  Methodology:  
A Design Thinking Process and 
Systems Analysis Framework 
Chapter Three: Methodology      42 
[3.1]  ?Design Thinking? as a Methodological Framework 
 
[3.1.1]  Definitions and aims of design thinking 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      43 
Chapter Three: Methodology      44 
SCIENTIFIC, SYSTEMS AND DESIGN THINKING COMPARISONS 
 
Table 3.1. This table compares the differences between scientific, systems and design 
thinking which are explored in this thesis (Kach, Azadegan, & Chethan, 2009, p. 18). 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      45 
[3.1.2]  Summary 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      46 
[3.2]  Human Centred Design Methods  
 
[3.2.1]  Definitions of human centred design 
[3.2.2]  Literature review of HCD methods
Chapter Three: Methodology      47 
[3.2.3]  Democratic design methods 
Chapter Three: Methodology      48 
[3.2.3.1]  Democratic method: ?design by proxy? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      49 
Figure 3.1 Sketches for an HIV Kenya campaign drawn by non-design participants (left, 
middle) and refined by American designers (right). This method of HCD asks non-designers to 
come up with design concepts for a campaign that a professional designer refines into a final 
poster (Bennett, Krishnamoorthy, Eglash, & Rarieya, 2006, pp. 194-195). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      50 
 
 
Figure 3.2. 'An Easy Guide to Breast Screening' produced by patients with learning disabilities 
and the Royal College of Psychiatrists was developed using a design by proxy HDC method. 
Here a woman is shown on the cover proudly standing in her underwear?which is not an 
accurate depiction of the breast screening experience (Department of Health: NHS, 2006). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      51 
 
 
Figure 3.3. The images used in this NHS guide may be appropriate for an audience with 
learning disabilities but the images may not be appropriate for a general audience 
(Department of Health: NHS, 2006). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      52 
[3.2.3.2]  Democratic method: ?design by collaboration? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      53 
[3.2.3.3]  Democratic method: ?design by co-ownership? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      54 
[3.2.3.4]  Why is Democratic Design Needed? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      55 
[3.2.3.5]  Weakness of Democratic Design Methods 
Chapter Three: Methodology      56 
[3.2.4]  Empathic design methods 
Chapter Three: Methodology      57 
Figure 3.4. Three levels of patient empathy for research are based on cognitive, emotional and 
physical needs, Based on a drawing by Tim Brown (Brown, Innovation through Design 
Thinking, 2006). Illustration by Author. 
[3.2.4.1]  Cognitive Empathy 
Chapter Three: Methodology      58 
[3.2.4.2]  Emotional Empathy 
[3.2.4.3]  Physical Empathy 
Chapter Three: Methodology      59 
[3.2.4.4]  Example of Empathy at Work 
[3.2.4.5]  Why is Empathic Design Needed? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      60 
[3.2.4.6]  Weaknesses of Empathic Design Methods 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      61 
 
[3.2.5]  Summary and conclusion 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      62 
[3.3]  Establishing a Design Thinking Methodology 
 
[3.3.1]  A literature review of current design thinking models 
Chapter Three: Methodology      63 
 
? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      64 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
[3.4]  Review of Design Thinking Models 
Chapter Three: Methodology      65 
Figure 3.5. These three units of analysis were used to organise the research of design thinking 
models. 
[3.4.1]  Overview of models 
 
Figure 3.6.This figure compares six design thinking models according to activities, stages and 
phases. The strengths from each model were combined to create a new model under a new 
terminology. For those categories that were left blank above, it was because the models did 
not clearly state specific activities, stages or phases in the explanations of their models. 
Illustration by Author.
Chapter Three: Methodology      66 
[3.4.1.1]  IDEO Model 
 
 
Figure 3.7. IDEO?s design thinking phases increased in synthesis as a project progresses 
(Brown, Innovation through Design Thinking, 2006).  
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      67 
Figure 3.8. IDEO?s stages and activities of design thinking. (Brown, Innovation through Design 
Thinking, 2006, 15:44).
Chapter Three: Methodology      68 
 
Figure 3.9. According to Brown, social, cultural, cognitive, emotional and physical factors need 
to be understood in order to be successful (Brown, Innovation through Design Thinking, 2006, 
21:00).
  
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      69 
[3.4.1.2]  Stanford University D.School model 
 
Figure 3.10. Stanford D.school views the design thinking process as an iterative cycle of 
empathy, definition, ideation, prototyping and testing (Kembel, Awakening Creativity 2009). 
 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      70 
[3.4.1.3]  SPARC Model  
Chapter Three: Methodology      71 
[3.4.1.4]  Design Council model 
Figure 3.11. The ?double diamond? design process model by the Design Council is a series of 
diverging and converging activities that include ?discover?, ?define?, ?develop? and ?deliver? 
stages (Design Council, Eleven Lessons: Managing design in eleven global companies, 2007). 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      72 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Three: Methodology      73 
[3.4.1.5]  AIGA model 
 
 
Figure 3.12. AIGA ?Design for Success? was arranged into 12 stages that were contained within 
three phases: ?defining? (1-4), ?innovating? (5-8) and ?generating value? (9-12).
Chapter Three: Methodology      74 
[3.4.1.6]  Barry and Beckman model 
 
 
Figure 3.13. Barry and Beckman viewed design thinking as problem and solution finding and 
selecting (Barry, Michael; Beckman, Sara L., Developing Design Thinking Capabilities,, 2008). 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      75 
 
 
 
Table 3.2. Barry and Beckman's design thinking process model organised according to 
category, goal and type. 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      76 
[3.4.1.7]  Design thinking models?a comparison on reflection
Chapter Three: Methodology      77 
[3.4.2]  Building a new design thinking model
  
Chapter Three: Methodology      78 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      79 
 
Figure 3.14. Diagram of the USER model, which organises design thinking and design 
producing activities according to problem or solution stages, abstract and concrete stages, 
and analysis and synthesis stages. Typically, after an issue has been identified for 
investigation, the model would begin with the User stage and then cycle through to the Realise 
stage. However, it?s not anticipated that it would occur in an orderly, regimented fashion, 
rather it would progress between problem and solution halves according to the project needs. 
(Illustration by Author) 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      80 
Chapter Three: Methodology      81 
Figure 3.15. This figure illustrates how various authors and models were combined to create 
the USER model. (Illustration by Author) 
Chapter Three: Methodology      82 
Figure 3.16. Description of the USER model. (Illustration by Author) 
Chapter Three: Methodology      83 
[3.5]  Developing a Systems Framework for Design Thinking 
[3.5.1]  A framework for analysing health care systems  
Chapter Three: Methodology      84 
Chapter Three: Methodology      85 
[3.5.2]  Exploring activity theory in a design context
 Figure 3.17. The relationship between humans and objects of environment can be seen as 
mediated by cultural means, tools and signs. In this view, human action has a tripartite 
structure (Helsinki, 2008). 
 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      86 
Figure 3.18. This diagram illustrates the relationship between myself as the designer and the 
patient/user. The objects that would connect us are the worked designed in this thesis 
(Illustration by Author). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      87 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
[3.5.3]  Modifying the activity theory model for design 
Chapter Three: Methodology      88 
Figure 3.19. The structure of a human activity system (Activity Theory Triangle) This model 
illustrates the elements of activity systems that are used to understand the user. The Subject 
is the one that commissions or develops the project (such as a designer). The Object is the 
user (such as a patient). And in order to succeed, rules, community, labour and instruments 
must be factored in to understand how the user achieves the outcome (University of Helsinki, 
2008). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      89 
Figure 3.20. Activity triangle for service design. This model illustrates the different 
components of an activity that need to be considered to understand the full context of a 
problem. This example more clearly shows where people are located in the system through 
visualising people. Illustration by Author based on (University of Helsinki, 2008). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      90 
Chapter Three: Methodology      91 
Chapter Three: Methodology      92 
Figure 3.21. IDEO's user levels fit the categories of activity theory well, with the addition of a 
?political? element in the activity triangle. Left image based on a drawing by Brown (Brown, 
Innovation through Design Thinking, 2006). 
 
[3.5.3.1]  Additional modifications to the activity theory model 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      93 
 
 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      94 
Figure 3.22. By overlaying the three examples in the previous figure, it becomes apparent 
which connections have yet to be considered in order to understand the 'entire' problem 
(Illustration by Author). 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      95 
Figure 3.23. New activity theory model focused on constraints, roles and objects as the 
mediating forces between people (Illustration by Author). 
Chapter Three: Methodology      96 
 
 
 
 
Figure 3.24. The revised ?activity triangle? for design (Illustration by Author). 
 
Chapter Three: Methodology      97 
Chapter Three: Methodology      98 
 
 
 
 
4.  The User as Patient 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      100 
[4.1]  Empathising with the Patient Experience  
 
[4.1.1]  The roles of empathy and in-situ experience in design 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      101 
[4.2]  Empirical Primary Research of the Detection and 
Screening Experience 
 
[4.2.1]  USA GP Experiences 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      102 
[4.2.2]  UK NHS GP Experiences 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      103 
[4.2.2.1]  Patient experiences at a GP conclusion 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      104 
[4.2.3]  Experiences at an imaging center (breast screening unit) 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      105 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      106 
[4.2.3.1]  Imaging centre conclusion 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      107 
[4.3]  Identifying Patient Needs to Establish Design 
Recommendations 
Figure 4.1. Patients were analysed according to three factors: cognitive, emotional and 
physical. These factors were then used to produce recommendations on how to better 
communicate visually through designed materials. Illustration by Author. 
 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      108 
[4.4]  Emotional Patient Needs: Identifying Emotional 
Barriers to Information 
 
[4.4.1]  Emotional Needs of Patients: Literature Review 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      109 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      110 
Figure 4.2. The health belief model as applied to breast cancer detection illustrates the 
connection between threat and coping information that initiates a protective reaction?based 
on a chart by Munro et al (Munro, Lewin, Swart, & Volmink, 2007, pp. 6-7). 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      111 
Figure 4.3. Protection Motivation Theory as applied to breast cancer detection and negative 
emotions based on a chart by Munro et al (Munro, Lewin, Swart, & Volmink, 2007, pp. 6-7). 
 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      112 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
[4.4.1.1]  Examples of visual relationships 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      113 
Figure 4.4. A campaign by The Breast Cancer Fund illustrates a strong threat message that is 
not coupled with a coping message which can effect a patient's response to breast cancer 
detection. It also closely links the message of ?sex? with the nude breast next to ?death? with a 
mastectomy scar. This creates a striking image but does not communicate lifesaving 
information (Breast Cancer Fund, 2000). 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      114 
Figure 4.5. This ?Obsessed with Breasts? campaign poster by The Breast Cancer Fund contains 
multiple threat messages without a coping message (Breast Cancer Fund, 2000). 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      115 
[4.4.1.2]  ?All-or-nothing? emotional reactivity 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      116 
[4.4.1.3]  NBOCC studies on emotional barriers 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      117 
[4.4.1.4]  NBOCC communication solution to these emotional barriers 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      118 
Figure 4.6. Materials designed to overcome emotional barriers to breast cancer by NBOCC 
were entirely text-based (NBOCC, 2005). 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      119 
[4.4.2]  Emotional Patient Needs: Design Recommendations & Conclusions 
Figure 4.7. Emotional issues of women that inhibit information transfer of breast cancer. 
Illustration by Author. 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      120 
 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      121 
[4.5]  Cognitive Patient Needs: Identifying Patient Breast 
Cancer Knowledge 
[4.5.1]  Results of an empirical survey on breast cancer detection issues 
[4.5.1.1]  About the respondents 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      122 
Figure 4.8. Map of the location of respondents of the breast cancer survey (2007). 
[4.5.1.2]  Patient beliefs on breast cancer success rates 
[4.5.1.3]  Patient beliefs on family history definition and impact on risk 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      123 
[4.5.1.4]  Patient knowledge of breast cancer symptoms 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      124 
[4.5.1.5]  Patient beliefs of screening method importance 
?WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO DETECT BREAST CANCER? 1= NOT USEFUL, 5=MOST USEFUL?: 
 
Figure 4.9. When participants were asked to rank the usefulness of breast cancer detection 
methods, mammography ranked the highest. 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      125 
[4.5.1.6]  Patient beliefs on screening methods 
[4.5.1.7]  Patient beliefs on breast self-exams 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      126 
[4.5.1.8]  Patient beliefs on frequency of clinical breast exams 
 ?HOW FREQUENTLY SHOULD AN AVERAGE WOMAN GET A CLINICAL EXAM IN THE 
FOLLOWING AGE RANGES??: 
Figure 4.10. This graph illustrates that most respondents believed that a clinical exam should 
happen yearly, but decreased with age. The second most popular response was to receive a 
clinical exam quarterly between the age of 40-69. 
[4.5.1.9]  Patient beliefs on frequency of mammograms 
 ?HOW FREQUENTLY SHOULD AN AVERAGE WOMAN GET A MAMMOGRAM IN THE 
FOLLOWING AGE RANGES??: 
Figure 4.11. This graph indicates that respondents felt that mammography should occur every 
year from ages 40-69. However, screening mammography shouldn't occur prior to age 40, 
which showed a misconception for the 20-39 age groups that was an overestimation. 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      127 
[4.5.1.10]  Emotional associations with the topic of breast cancer 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 4.12. When participants were asked to describe their emotional reaction to breast 
cancer, half of the participants had a negative response, indicating emotional issues were a 
relevant factor. 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      128 
? 
? 
[4.5.2]  Cognitive Patient Needs: Design Recommendations & Conclusion 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      129 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      130 
[4.5.3]  Physical Patient Needs: Identifying Physical Categories of Patients 
 
[4.5.3.1]  Geographic location 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      131 
[4.5.3.2]  Risk factors 
Figure 4.13. NCI's Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (NCI, 2007). This tool allows 
individuals and physicians to answer questions about risk factors in order to calculate a 
patient's risk level. If a patient has a high risk level, then additional screening procedures may 
be recommended. 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      132 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      133 
[4.5.3.3]  Risk statistics according to age 
 
Table 4.1. Risk statistics based on the SEER 2003 NCI report find that women above the age 
of 60 are at the highest risk for breast cancer (NCI, 2006). 
Figure 4.14. Many breast cancer campaigns depict young women as being the ?poster child? for 
breast cancer. However, the mean age women diagnosed with breast cancer is 61. This would 
make the poster on the right more accurate than the original version on the left. Based on the 
poster by Time for Pink (Time for Pink, 2009). 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      134 
[4.5.4]  Physical Patient Needs: Design Recommendations 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      135 
[4.6]  Patient Needs: Design Guidelines  
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      136 
? 
? 
[4.6.1]  Conclusion 
[4.6.1.1]  Patient Personas 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      137 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      138 
Chapter Four: The User as Patient      139 
 
 
 
 
5.  The System of Detection 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     141 
[5.1]  Identifying the Breast Cancer Detection Community 
 
[5.1.1]  Key Breast Cancer Organisations 
 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     142 
Figure 5.1. Additional groups involved in the 'human network' for breast cancer detection. 
Illustration by Author. 
 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     143 
Figure 5.2. Government agencies in the US were a diverse mix of cancer research, military 
funding, human resource and cancer screening programmes. Illustration by Author.
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     144 
Figure 5.3. Non-government breast cancer organisations were chosen based on size and 
influence and an active online educational programme. Professional organisations were 
included to give context to government recommendations. Revenue figures were gathered from 
charitynavigator.org. Dr. Susan Love?s Foundation?s revenue was sourced from the Better 
Business Bureau. Illustration by Author. 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     145 
Figure 5.4. Organisations in the UK (government and non-government). The UK had a very 
linear governmental structure. Non-governmental organisations revenue were sourced from 
the Charity Commission. Organisations were selected based on financial health and mission to 
provide information on detection in breast cancer. Illustration by Author. 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     146 
 
 
 
Table 5.1. Table of USA-UK organisation equivalents. While some organisations drew 
parallels, there was not a similar organisation to the NHS in the US because no government 
organisation in the US directly controls the health system. Understanding what organisations 
were similar or dissimilar provided opportunities to compare across health systems. 
Illustration by Author. 
 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     147 
[5.2]  Rules of the Breast Cancer Community: Screening 
  Recommendations in the UK and USA 
  
[5.2.1]  Comparison of recommendations in the UK and USA 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     148 
Table 5.2. Screening Recommendations of Health Organisations (Komen, 2008). This chart by 
American breast cancer charity ?Komen for the Cure? outlined the differences in screening 
recommendations in the USA for women of average risk (UK added for comparison). In the 
USA, there is no central health authority due to a privatised healthcare system and charities 
often make their own independent recommendations. In contrast in the UK, the NHS is able to 
decide screening policies and regulate them accordingly. 
(1) http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/index.html 
(2) http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/breastawareness.html 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     149 
[5.2.2]  Changing recommendations 
[5.2.2.1]  ?More is better? argument 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     150 
[5.2.2.2]  Cost benefit argument 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     151 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     152 
[5.3]  Mapping the Diagnostic Patient Journey In Breast 
Cancer Detection  
[5.3.1]  The patient breast cancer detection journey 
[5.3.1.1]  Diagnostic options for symptomatic patients 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     153 
Figure 5.5. Flow chart for diagnosing a breast lump in the NHS (Austoker & Mansel, 2003). 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     154 
Figure 5.6. Recommendations for diagnostic pathways for patients with referred symptoms 
(Austoker & Mansel, 2003, p. 21).  
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     155 
[5.3.1.2]  Diagnostic options for asymptomatic patients 
Figure 5.7. ?What happens at a breast screening unit?? charts the diagnostic path from 
screening invitation to treatment using terminology in a physician-centred way, rather than a 
patient-centred way (NHS, 2007). 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     156 
Invitation  mammogram  result abnormal  further testing 
Invitation  mammogram  result normal  no further testing 
symptom  physician  mammogram  result  further testing if needed 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     157 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     158 
[5.4]  Communication connections in breast cancer detection  
 
[5.4.1]  Mapping the communication connections in the detection process 
Figure 5.8. Communication map illustrating connections between people involved in breast 
cancer detection. Illustration by Author. 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     159 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     160 
 
Figure 5.9. Suzanne's story highlights the touchpoints between the patient and the health 
system and where they succeeded and failed. This analysis reveals opportunities for 
innovation and improvement for other patients. 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     161 
Health 
practitioner Communication responsibilities 
How this is 
communicated 
GP 
Decide if symptom needs further 
investigation Spoken 
Talk to patients about breast screening 
plan Spoken 
Specialist Communicate with GP and patient about further screening, results and options 
Letter from NHS, oral 
communication in 
person 
NHS Admin Send invitation to mammography Letter from NHS 
Nurse 
Technician Follow correct x-ray procedures 
Discussion with patient 
during procedure, 
Needs to know what 
procedures to follow 
based on doctor 
recommendation 
Radiologist Read x-rays and inform specialist/GP of result 
Written object, 
sometimes discussion 
with patient if a 
diagnostic x-ray, but 
usually not for screening 
GP Admins Send result of test Written object 
Spouse, 
family, 
friends 
Console, remind, encourage, suggest or 
discourage participation in reporting 
symptoms, attending mammograms, etc. 
Spoken 
Designer 
Organise content into a deliverable output 
as defined by health 
educator/manager/practitioner 
Designed object 
 
Table 5.3. By highlighting the communication roles of each of the people involved in the 
detection process, it revealed areas where communication was not transferred in a tangible 
way (yellow sections). 
 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     162 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     163 
Figure 5.10. Event map for the breast cancer detection process. This map helps to identify 
communication points along the patient journey, as well as inform the patient of the detection 
process in a simple visual way. Illustration by Author.
Chapter Five: The System of Detection     164 
Figure 5.11. The patient journey of breast cancer detection was divided into four events. The 
first three events of 'find symptom', 'doctor confirms' and 'mammogram' were the focus of this 
doctoral work. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.  Establishing a Visual Strategy 
for Breast Cancer Detection  
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      166 
[6.1]  Developing a Visual Communication Strategy for 
Breast Cancer Detection 
 
 
[6.1.1]  Understanding the current visual language of breast cancer 
[6.1.1.1]  Visualisation of breast cancer symptoms 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      167 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
WARNING! 
Explicitly graphic photographs of advanced breast 
cancer is depicted in the following page.  
 
Please do not proceed further if viewing the 
photographs will cause distress. 
 
 
Facsimile 6.1. Warning labels were sometimes issued to viewers on websites warning them of 
the graphic nature of the content (Ho, 2003).  
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      168 
Figure 6.1. Photograph of signs of breast cancer that carried a 'graphic content' warning show 
?dimpling? on the left and ?indentation? and ?nipple retraction? on the right (Ho, 2003). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      169 
Figure 6.2. Images of signs of breast cancer are explicitly graphic and would likely be 
censored in public. Images compiled from various websites via a Google search (2006). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      170 
Figure 6.3. When the breast is coded in line drawings with limited colour, the lack of detail 
can interfere with the decoding of the image (Scriptography, 1996). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      171 
Figure 6.4. This image demonstrates how abstract visuals (Scriptography, 1996) may leave 
more room for interpretation than is desired or intended. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      172 
[6.1.2]  Literature review of visual theories 
 
[6.1.2.1]  Visual cognition  
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      173 
[6.1.2.2]  Anchoring ideas and metaphors 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      174 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      175 
Figure 6.5. By illustrating the myths of breast cancer, it became a visual study of objects that 
could metaphorically act as a substitute for a breast. Although a lemon wasn't included in this 
initial collection of 32 myths, this exploratory process led to finding the lemon metaphor at a 
later stage. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      176 
Figure 6.6. Comparison of lemon to breast structure revealed similarities in both appearance 
and internal composition (Pearson Education, 2009). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      177 
Figure 6.7. When it was found that a cancerous lump feels hard and immovable like an 
almond, it was possible to transfer this information onto the metaphor and use the lemon seed 
as the analogy for a cancerous lump. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      178 
Figure 6.8. This visual was designed to illustrate the symptoms of breast cancer by mapping 
the concept of a breast onto a lemon. This allowed for visual detail to be introduced without 
becoming grotesque, such as displaying signs of breast cancer without showing breasts 
(2006). Illustration by Author. 
[6.1.2.3]  Signifier chains 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      179 
Breast = Sex 
Cancer = Death 
Figure 6.9. A campaign by The Breast Cancer Fund illustrates a cognitive shift in associations 
with breast cancer. For example, the message of ?sex? with the nude breast next to ?death? with 
a mastectomy scar. This creates a striking image but may not communicate necessary 
information effectively (Breast Cancer Fund, 2000). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      180 
[6.1.2.4]  Visual pluralities 
Figure 6.10. Lemons sitting on a sofa. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      181 
Figure 6.11. Robert Horn discussed the emergence of a visual language as a new international 
auxiliary language that tightly integrates words, images and shapes (Horn, 2001, p. 2). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      182 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      183 
? 
? 
? 
 
THE STRUCTURE OF MEANING RELATIONSHIPS 
Table 6.2. Adapted from ?The Structure of Meaning Relationships? (Moriarty, Visual Semiotics 
Theory, 2005, p. 237). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      184 
[6.1.3]  Analysis of the work developed in this thesis 
Figure 6.12. The construction, rendering and placement of the visual elements, combine to 
create a symbolic meaning which transform the lemons into breasts. Illustration by Author. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      185 
Figure 6.13. When one element is changed, such as the rendering of the colour in the poster, 
the message changes. In this image, the dark setting and negative images indicate a ghostly 
appearance. Illustration by Author. 
 
[6.1.4]  Conclusion 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      186 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      187 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      188 
[6.2]  Visually Representing Women 
 
[6.2.1]  A design review of breast cancer materials 
 
 
 
 
[6.2.1.1]  The ?several materials for several audiences? approach 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      189 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      190 
Figure 6.14. Cover of the ?Lesbians and Women who Partner with Women? design 
recommendation guidelines by Komen (Frame, Lesbians and Women who Partner with Women: 
Developing Effective Cancer Education Print Materials, 2005). 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      191 
Figure 6.15. Cover of the Hispanic/Latina design recommendation guidelines (Ramieriz, 
2005). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      192 
Figure 6.16. Cover of design recommendations for 'Asians and Pacific Islanders' by Komen 
(Frame & al, Asians and Pacific Islanders: Developing Effective Cancer Education Print 
Materials, 2005). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      193 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      194 
[6.2.1.2]  The ?group photo? approach 
Figure 6.17. This leaflet by the NCI showed a variety of women from different racial 
backgrounds, as well as ages, to address multiple audiences. It used an illustrative method to 
represent women (The Facts about Breast Cancer and Mammograms. NCI, 1997). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      195 
Figure 6.18. This leaflet by Krames Communications (1994) also represented multiple races 
in their visuals to increase audience reach, through a detailed drawing. 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      196 
Figure 6.19. A large variety of women were pictured in the NHS breast screening leaflet for 
women with learning disabilities (DoH NHS, 2006) . This required a large amount of space 
however, and resulted in emphasising certain groups over others. For example, the woman 
with a shaved pink head and piercings is further towards the back than the blonde woman at 
the front. A woman with a head scarf is very small and at the very back of the crowd as well, 
which may indicate a lesser importance, which can decrease relevance for those groups, as it 
may be difficult to pick out their face ?from the crowd? or indicate inequality. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      197 
[6.2.1.3]  Visualising the mammogram experience 
Figure 6.20. This NHS leaflet on breast screening uses Caucasian women to illustrate the 
mammography process, which may not appear relevant to non-Caucasian audiences (NHS, 
2006). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      198 
Figure 6.21. This photo was used in an US government website to illustrate the mammography 
experience. However, the visual elements were coded in an out-dated way, by including out-
 dated hairstyles, accessories (eye glasses) and a contrived posing stance. Visuals that include 
out-dated appearances may lead the viewer to believe the information surrounding the visual 
has expired as well and is not relevant to them today (NCI, 2006). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      199 
Figure 6.22. This photo shows a woman in a black room, gently holding onto the 
mammography machine and with a slight smile looking off into the distance while her breast 
is flattened. The facial expression does not match the experience (source via web search for 
mammography, http://www.siumed.edu/breastcenter/images/mammogram.jpg). 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      200 
Figure 6.23. This illustration about mammography shows a patient who is happy having her 
breast handled by the technician, which is also an unlikely event (American Cancer Society, 
pre-2006). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      201 
Figure 6.24. This image used by the NHS in a breast screening leaflet shows a romanticised 
view of the mammography experience (through lighting and colour choice), which may lead 
some viewers to have a romanticised view of the process which may lead to a disappointing 
experience and a lack of trust in the information source (NHS, 2006).  
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      202 
[6.2.1.4]  The ?using symbols? visual approach 
  
Figure 6.25. The leaflet on the left was produced and distributed in Wal-Mart in the USA 
(2005). No images of women were used, instead visuals of flowers were included, avoiding any 
discrimination, but also making the leaflet less potentially relatable (left). The leaflet on the 
right by the American Cancer Society (ACS, 2006) used the feminine colour purple and the 
breast cancer ribbon to visually indicate the topic of breast cancer (right). 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      203 
[6.2.1.5]  ?Racial abstraction? method 
Figure 6.26. The Illustration used by the American Cancer Society (1991) abstracts the visual 
of a woman into a line drawing (top) which isn?t racially identifiable. The illustrations used by 
Channing el Bete company (1996) used an illustration of a woman that was racially ambiguous 
but included more detail than a line drawing (bottom left). However, some illustrations 
became comical, which may not have been the intention of the message as is seen in the 
image bottom right as the technician appears to jokingly grab the patient?s breast, also by 
Bete (1996). Still circulated in 2006. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      204 
[6.2.2]  Visual strategy conclusion 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      205 
[6.3]  Visually Representing Women: The Mayor Solution 
[6.3.1]  ?The Mayor? 
Figure 6.27. Sample of female silhouettes, arranged in order from sexual to asexual in form. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      206 
Figure 6.28. Original version of 'The Mayor' breast cancer spokesperson, used to represent 
women (2006). 
 
[6.3.1.1]  Improvements to ?The Mayor? 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      207 
Figure 6.29. Several silhouette shapes were designed to establish a figure that was feminine 
without being sexually indicative, this included modifying the hair, torso and legs. 
Figure 6.30. Suzanne was diagnosed with a rare form of breast cancer whilst I was working on 
my thesis. I spent the afternoon with her and we discussed her wig, this shape later became 
the inspiration for The Mayor's hairstyle. 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      208 
Figure 6.31. The author trying on Suzanne's wig in 2007. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      209 
Figure 6.32. The Mayor before the redesign and after the redesign, which gave her more 
personality, style and added symbolism (2007). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      210 
Figure 6.33. Analysis of design elements (signifiers) for The Mayor figure. 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      211 
Figure 6.34. Examples of female and male figures in the Isotype collection, by Gerd Arntz 
(Vossoughian, 2008). 
Figure 6.35. Signature of The Mayor was designed as an authoritative mark signifying approval 
from The Mayor (2008). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      212 
Figure 6.36. The Mayor was illustrated in different positions of running, standing and waving. 
The running figure was included due to the popularity of running events for breast cancer. The 
standing figure was used to indicate a calm mood, and the waving figure was used for friendly 
?introduction? messages (2008). 
 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      213 
 
Figure 6.37. The Mayor figure was also drawn in sitting positions. She is depicted here as 
taking the place of the lemons on the green sofa. 
 
[6.3.2]  Testing The Mayor with multiple audiences 
 
[6.3.2.1]  Non-Western audience: Qatar 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      214 
Figure 6.38. In 2008, these photos were taken of college students in Qatar looking at the 
breast cancer materials I designed. Notice how they are similarly dressed to The Mayor with 
the black dress and sleeves. Courtesy of Cadena-Malek, 2008. 
[6.3.2.2]  Global audiences: Online Survey 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      215 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      216 
Figure 6.39. Women in the survey were asked which leaflet they would prefer to read. 34 out 
of 40 participants selected The Mayor leaflet A. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      217 
Figure 6.40. Gray highlights were added to The Mayor's hair to increase her age (2010). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      218 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      219 
[6.4]  Developing a Brand for the Breast Cancer Materials 
[6.4.1]  Storytelling devices 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      220 
Figure 6.41. This is an illustration used on one of the original websites encouraging women to 
?Visit Lemonland Once a Month?. This was designed in 2006 when breast self-exam 
recommendations were more formal and accepted than today in 2010. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      221 
Figure 6.42. Originally, the ?plus symbol? at the end of the wordmark was to be used as a 
replacement of the ?Lemonland? wordmark in the case of limited space. However, in order to 
develop recognition for an abstract mark such as this, a great deal of repetition and money 
needed to be spent before the public would connect the mark to breast cancer. This seemed 
unnecessary when a mark already existed for the disease?the pink ribbon. So the mark was 
abandoned and the pink ribbon symbol was embedded into the wordmark (2006). 
 
 
Figure 6.43. For the typeface, sharp forms were avoided and a typeface with rounded edges 
was used, representative of a woman?s curves but more friendly than feminine. Additionally,  
thin character style was avoided so that the wordmark wouldn?t be a signifier of dainty or 
weak, but solid and stable. The website address as part of the mark was also incorporated, 
which lacked a visual flow as seen here (2007). 
  
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      222 
? 
? 
? 
Figure 6.44. The first 'Worldwide Breast Cancer' logo was right justified with a more frilly 
subtitle script, which became illegible at small sizes (2008). 
 
Figure 6.45. The final Worldwide Breast Cancer logo was designed with a stronger, more 
saturated pink colour, and a refined script typeface that was more legible than the original 
script typeface at smaller sizes and matched the uniformity of the Frankfurter font (2009). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      223 
[6.4.2]  Worldwide Breast Cancer branding guidelines 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      224 
 
 
Figure 6.46. The branding guide gave examples of how the wordmark should not be used. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      225 
Figure 6.47. The branding guide included examples of how the logo would work with various 
background colours. 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      226 
[6.4.2.1]  Colour scheme 
Figure 6.48. Colour scheme guidelines for breast cancer materials were finalised toward the 
end of the work (2009). 
 
 
Chapter Six: Establishing a Visual Strategy      227 
[6.5]  Chapter Conclusion 
 
 
 
 
7.  Realising Print Materials 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     229 
[7.1]  Designing Materials for Patient Events 
 
Figure 7.1. The patient journey of breast cancer detection was divided into four events. The 
first three events: 'find symptom', 'doctor confirms' and 'mammogram' were the primary focus 
of this doctoral work. 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     230 
[7.2]  Patient Event 1: Finding the Symptom 
 
[7.2.1]  Literature review of symptoms 
 
[7.2.1.1]  Finding the symptom?through ?breast self-exam? or ?breast 
awareness?? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     231 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     232 
 
 
[7.2.1.2]  Reporting symptoms of breast cancer 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     233 
[7.2.2]  Communicating visible symptoms of breast cancer 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     234 
Figure 7.2. Illustration of signs of breast cancer that was shown to a leading breast cancer 
oncologist and was verified to be accurate. Illustration by Author (2003). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     235 
[7.2.3]  User testing with the symptoms image 
 
 
[7.2.3.1]  First survey testing the symptoms visual 
Figure 7.3. Study #1: Participants were shown the new image at full-screen size and asked to 
label each sign lettered A-L. This is the image survey participants viewed in order to suggest 
their own labels for each sign of breast cancer. Illustration by Author (2008). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     236 
Figure 7.4. Rate of accurate interpretation per symptom found that most interpretations were 
accurate but some symptoms needed adjustment and were more dependent on a text 
description than others. (ibid) 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     237 
Figure 7.5. Final refined signs image based on feedback from public survey (2010). 
[7.2.3.2]  Survey conclusion and results 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     238 
[7.2.3.3] Adding text labels 
Figure 7.6. Early version of ?signs of breast cancer? image. Originally, the labels were 
'stamped' onto each lemon in a rasterized format. However, when future translations would be 
needed the image, this labelling system would be difficult because it would require the text to 
be adjusted manually to fit the contour of each lemon for each language, rather than just 
changing the text in a vector format, which is more editable than a raster format. 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     239 
Figure 7.7. Grey's Book of Anatomy diagram of bone marrow cells used an italic text for 
labelling. This is one typographical signifier of a medical illustration (Serc Media, 2006). 
Figure 7.8. Text labels were changed to overlay on top of the image, in a typeface that was 
similar to professional medical anatomy illustrations to appear more medically authoritative 
(2009). 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     240 
[7.2.4]  Second survey testing symptoms visual (and text) results 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     241 
Figure 7.9. Most people surveyed had a positive educational experience with the signs image. 
Figure 7.10. The final image of the signs of breast cancer incorporated user feedback on both 
the text and visual elements (2010). 
8. Would you be able to recognise these signs on yourself better now that you've seen the image? Tick all that apply.
 Item Count Percent %
 The image has helped me understand signs of breast cancer, better than the text
 alone. 32 88.89%
 The image makes me feel more confident in my ability to recognise breast cancer. 23 63.89%
 The image makes me nervous about breast cancer, more than the text description. 8 22.22%
 I would recognise these signs without having seen the image or the text
 description. 2 5.56%
 Great visual metaphor! 1 2.78%
 I am still unsure what is meant by "invisible lump" and "nipple retraction", even with
 the image 1 2.78%
 I find it a bit strange that lemons are used!  But I suppose you are not allowed to
 show breasts in any kinds of advertising, even if it could help prevent cancer which
 seems sad to me.
 1 2.78%
 I think it is a wonderful image for use in teaching about breast cancer! 1 2.78%
 really good new way to illustrate this 1 2.78%
 Really useful! 1 2.78%
 seeing is more conclusive 1 2.78%
 The image was extremly helpful 1 2.78%
 the picture is an awesome graphic! 1 2.78%
 The visual example of how symptoms might appear is very helpful. Would help
 people who have problems understanding written information. 1 2.78%
 very good to have the image as well as the description 1 2.78%
 what a great graphic tool for explaining the signs 1 2.78%
 Page 8 of 10
 Response Summary Report
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     242 
[7.2.5]  Evolution of the symptoms poster 
Figure 7.11. The original background of the symptoms poster was white, with a simple line of 
text to identify the source. The white made the image very clear, but seemed too stark for a 
friendly message. Also note the amount of space the carton lid used in the image (2003).  
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     243 
Figure 7.12. The next poster included a yellow band along the bottom to act as a space for 
identifying the brand in the full series of posters and including a signature of ?The Mayor? of 
Lemonland as an endorsement. Corners were rounded to reflect the round shape of the breast 
and the rounded corners on the website (2005). 
Figure 7.13. After The Mayor was redesigned with her signature on her skirt, she was added to 
the bottom corner of each poster in the series, with Creative Commons licensing information 
and the new Worldwide Breast Cancer.com address and wordmark added (2007). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     244 
Figure 7.14. Final poster of the signs of breast cancer had a muted branding allowing the 
image to take precedence, with the symptoms being shown at a larger size after the carton lid 
was reduced (2010). 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     245 
[7.2.6]  Communicating tactile symptoms of breast cancer 
Figure 7.15. This image was shown to patients to test memory recall between a traditional line 
drawing versus the visual metaphor (lemon). Image by (Patient.co.uk, 2009). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     246 
Figure 7.16. This early version of an illustration of breast anatomy used familiar foods to 
communicate tactile information (pre-2006). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     247 
[7.2.7]  Testing the anatomy visual and poster designs 
Figure 7.17. This updated poster was shown to cancer experts to determine if the anatomy of 
the breast had an accurate message (2007). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     248 
[7.2.7.1]  Changes to the anatomy poster 
Figure 7.18. Refined poster illustrating breast anatomy (2010). 
[7.2.7.2]  Survey to test the anatomy visual, summary and results 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     249 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     250 
[7.2.8]  Visualising the concept of a self-exam 
Figure 7.19. Lemons were put in several positions to illustrate the methods for breast self-
 exam. This image was included in the first version of the website in 2006. 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     251 
[7.2.8.1]  Testing the self-exam visual 
Figure 7.20. This image was shown to children to ask whether they saw a pair of breasts, to 
assess censorship potential (2010). 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     252 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     253 
[7.2.9]  Breast self-exam poster designs 
Figure 7.21. First phase version of the BSE sofa poster minimised the text in order to follow 
the curves of the sofa. This was a type solution that sacrificed function for form with a very 
aesthetic view of design, as the type was difficult for viewers to read (2003). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     254 
Figure 7.22. The second version of the BSE Sitting poster removed the pink rug, enlarged the 
lemons on the sofa and introduced The Mayor figure. However, the balance between text and 
image seemed to compete with each other (2007). 
Figure 7.23. Third phase of the BSE Sitting poster, uses a more saturated colour palette with 
an arched headline over the sofa, incorporating a script font that resembles the logo wordmark 
(2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     255 
[7.2.10]  Abandoned posters 
Figure 7.24. The bed poster was not taken past the first phase of design as it closely 
resembled the sofa poster message and was found to be redundant (2003). 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     256 
Figure 7.25. This second phase poster illustrated the ?shower BSE? concept, but was not part 
of the final phase three round of posters as the message of a ?shower? BSE was secondary to 
the BSE concept in general, which was illustrated by the sofa poster (2007). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     257 
Figure 7.26. 'Breast cancer dance poster' was created in phase two, but was later abandoned 
in favour of a leaflet that was designed as part of this doctoral work that combined the signs of 
breast cancer and anatomy images more effectively (2008). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     258 
[7.2.11]  Summary 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     259 
[7.3]  Patient Event 2: Doctor Confirms  
[7.3.1]  Clinical breast exam  
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     260 
Figure 7.27. This poster was designed to illustrate the patient event of a clinical breast exam 
(2006). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     261 
[7.3.2]  Self-reporting symptoms 
Register  waiting room  exam room  doctor arrives 
 
Register  waiting room  exam room where doctor is present 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     262 
 
Figure 7.28. A poster on the wall could guide the patient discussion by presenting topics for 
the patient to choose, or provide a pretext to the discussion for the patient while waiting for 
the doctor to arrive in the exam room. Illustration by Author, (2010). 
Figure 7.29. This poster describes the steps of screening as a way to stimulate conversation 
about a screening plan between doctor and patient (2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     263 
Figure 7.30. This poster illustrates rates of breast cancer worldwide and could be displayed in 
a women's clinic as part of breast cancer education (2010). 
 
[7.3.3]  Developing a communication aid for discussing a patient?s risk 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     264 
Figure 7.31. This form was designed to be used during a doctor's visit to discuss risk factors 
for breast cancer with the patient. The results from this discussion would then lead into 
creating a screening plan for the individual patient (2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     265 
Figure 7.32. Illustration of the form being filled-in by a physician during a patient discussion. 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     266 
[7.3.3.1]  Testing the risk assessment form 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     267 
Figure 7.33. This updated form was redesigned to make the purpose of the form more 
pronounced by using a black background. If the white boxes at the bottom were not filled in, it 
would be clear that the form had not been completed, compared to the other form, which 
didn?t intuitively suggest that a recommendation should be written on the form. Additional 
questions about lifestyle and HRT were also included based feedback from the oncologist. 
Illustration by Author (2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     268 
[7.3.4]  Possible ways to integrate the communication aids into the clinical 
exam experience 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     269 
Figure 7.34. Diagram of how the communication aids could be used during a clinical exam. 
Illustration by Author (2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     270 
[7.3.5]  Summary 
 
 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     271 
[7.4]  Patient Event 3: Mammogram 
 
Figure 7.35. The third patient event in the breast cancer detection process is mammography. 
[7.4.1]  Literature review of mammography 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     272 
DIFFERENCES IN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY IN USA AND UK 
 
Table 7.1. Screening mammograms are more frequent in the US than the UK, which also lead 
to increased false-positive and positive results. 
[7.4.1.1]  Benefits and risks of screening 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     273 
[7.4.1.2]  False-positive results 
CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY OF A FALSE-POSITIVE RESULT FOR A MULTIMODAL CANCER 
SCREENING REGIMEN 
Table 7.2. ?Cumulative probability of a false-positive result for a multimodal cancer screening 
regimen?. Women are shown in light gray (Croswell et al, 2009). 
 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     274 
[7.4.1.3]  False-negative results
  
[7.4.1.4]  High risk patient pathway 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     275 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     276 
[7.4.2]  Interviews with mammography technicians 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     277 
Tech x-rays patient  gives x-ray to radiologist  radiologist may ask for 
more x-rays  radiologist gives diagnostic opinion to technician  
mammography technician relays x-ray outcome to patient verbally 
 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     278 
Figure 7.36. Communication pathway for a diagnostic mammogram in private healthcare. The 
objects in blue are communication tools that could be used in each point in the pathway. 
Illustration by Author (2010). 
Figure 7.37. Communication pathway for a screening mammogram in the NHS. Illustration by 
Author (2010). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     279 
[7.4.3]  Testing communication aids in a mammography centre 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Figure 7.38. This poster illustrated mammography as a way to create a visual history of 
changes of the breast. Illustration by Author (2007). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     280 
Figure 7.39. Mary Jo Strack, lead mammographer in the screening centre in Oklahoma used 
the materials to educate patients in the centre. This photo shows Mary Jo with the anatomy 
poster, Mayor clock and calendar in the screening office. Photo courtesy MJ Strack (2008). 
[7.4.4]  Posters in an imaging clinic waiting room 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     281 
Figure 7.40. These photographs show how the posters were incorporated into the waiting room 
environment in the screening centre in Oklahoma. Patients were also offered a take-home 
leaflet, which was a request suggested by the patients after seeing the posters. Photos 
courtesy MJ Strack (2008).
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     282 
[7.4.4.1]  Signs of breast cancer poster in a changing/mammography room 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     283 
Figure 7.41. The ?signs of breast cancer? poster was displayed in the mammography room in 
the Oklahoma centre, which was also the room women used for changing into a gown prior to 
the procedure. The poster was found to stimulate conversation about the signs of breast 
cancer between the patient and the mammographer. Photo courtesy MJ Strack (2008). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     284 
[7.5]  All Patient Events: Breast Screening Leaflet 
 
[7.5.1]  Breast screening leaflet
 [7.5.1.1]  Oklahoma leaflet trial 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     285 
Figure 7.42. This leaflet was given to patients at the Oklahoma screening centre, and was 
printed locally with name and logo customised on the cover for the organisation. Photo 
courtesy MJ Strack (2008). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     286 
Figure 7.43. Screening leaflet side A. Illustration by Author (June 2008). 
Figure 7.44. Latest version of the screening leaflet side A. This included an older Mayor and 
information that could be used in the USA and UK. The lemon seed was also emphasised in 
the anatomy section, eliminating the lateral cross-section. (2010)
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     287 
 
Figure 7.45. Screening leaflet side B. Illustration by Author (June 2008). 
 
Figure 7.46. Screening leaflet side B. The ?dozen signs? image and labels were updated based 
on patient and clinician feedback. The frequency of mammograms were adjusted to reflect 
varied recommendations in the USA and UK. Information also included statistics on the 
effectiveness of self-exam and mammography. (2010) 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     288 
[7.5.1.2]  Oncologist feedback on the leaflet 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     289 
Figure 7.47. Final version of the breast screening leaflet (2011). 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     290 
[7.6]  Chapter Summary and Conclusion 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     291 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Seven: Realising Print Materials     292 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
 
 
 
 
8.  Realising the Website 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     294 
[8.1]  The Internet and Breast Cancer Detection 
 
[8.1.1]  Internet use in health information 
Figure 8.1. According to the 2007 HINTS survey, patients are twice as likely to go initially to 
the internet for cancer information, rather than speaking with a health care provider first 
(HINTS, 2009). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     295 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     296 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     297 
Figure 8.2. This data finds that younger audiences are more likely to engage online. This data 
may have changed since the growth of social networking sites such as Facebook, but reflects 
the roles internet users can participate in that can lead to engagement with breast cancer 
detection and screening (Hempel, 2007). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     298 
[8.1.2]  Design review of websites 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     299 
Figure 8.3. An overview of breast cancer websites collected in 2006 illustrated the reliance on 
text to communicate to audiences.
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     300 
Figure 8.4. CRUK website (2006). The CRUK website included a list of questions for patients 
to click on to discover more information. An image was included on the mammography page, 
which depicted a woman with a compressed breast. Finding the breast cancer section in the 
CRUK website was difficult and took three clicks and a few minutes to navigate to. Other types 
of cancer having to be covered on the website, as well as organisation and fundraising 
information announcements tended to clutter the presentation of the specific disease. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     301 
 
Figure 8.5. NHSBSP website (2006). The NHSBSP website has also changed very little since 
2006 and was similar to CRUK's website which listed questions about the programme as a 
navigation tool. Text was used in abundance. Finding this website was difficult to do via the 
main NHS website. Instead, this website was found through a Google web search asking for 
this particular department, which was not very patient accessible. However, it did contain 
several key sources of information useful to this thesis, such as patient pathway protocols and 
links to reports and statistics?ideal for a research audience. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     302 
Figure 8.6. NCI website on breast cancer (2006). The design and structure of the NCI website 
uses a large amount of text and links to present breast cancer information. The only images 
included on the site are those of smiling faces. This large amount of text may be too 
burdensome for some viewers to navigate. However, finding the breast cancer section on the 
NCI website was easy to find. The audience was for patients and physicians, as it had separate 
entry points for both. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     303 
Figure 8.7. Breakthrough Breast Cancer (2006). Breakthrough Breast Cancer used images to 
illustrate each topic of their breast cancer information section. However, when describing what 
to look for while being ?breast aware?, no visuals were used. The website was very easy to 
navigate, aimed at patients and design and it appeared as an integrated communication 
strategy, rather than an add-on. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     304 
Figure 8.8. Komen for the Cure website (2006). While the Komen website has undergone 
considerable changes since 2006, the first version was text heavy and placed images below 
descriptions. The image was of a topless woman looking away and included very feminine and 
soft colours. Navigation was easy to use, and it was clear that the presentation had patients in 
mind in the making of the website. 
detection
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     305 
[8.2]  Website Version One: Lemonland.org 
 
[8.2.1]  Version 1 (January 2006-October 2007, 21 Months) 
Figure 8.9. Home page of Version 1 of the Lemonland.org website (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     306 
Figure 8.10. Labelling structure of the Version 1 website (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     307 
Figure 8.11. If more words were needed in the right side column, it would create a gap below 
the image, pushing the rest of the page down and breaking the layout. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     308 
Figure 8.12. This screenshot of the Lemonland Version 1 ?Investigation? category has a sub-
 navigation menu which also had a fixed width limiting the amount of secondary links for each 
category (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     309 
 
Figure 8.13. Lemonland Version 1 ?Department of Defense? category page demonstrates how 
each category had a different visual to illustrate a new section (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     310 
Figure 8.14. Lemonland Version 1 ?Office of Citizenship? homepage (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     311 
Figure 8.15. ?The Mayor of Lemonland's Office?. Lemonland.org. Version 1 contained a 
disclaimer about the content (2006).  
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     312 
Figure 8.16. ?Myths? page in Lemonland Version 1 (2006). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     313 
[8.2.2]  Website feedback from a cancer radiologist 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     314 
[8.2.3]  Conclusion for improvements based on website version 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     315 
[8.3]  Website Version Two: Worldwidebreastcancer.com 
 
[8.3.1]  Version 2 (October 2007-February 2009, 16 Months) 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     316 
[8.3.2]  Description of redesign 
Figure 8.17. Homepage of website, Version 2 included buttons for each category with its own 
colour and icon, 2007. 
[8.3.2.1]  Navigation  
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     317 
Figure 8.18. Each category had its own colour, which changed according to the top navigation 
selection. The top navigation remained in a left-to-right alignment with the secondary 
navigation a top-to-bottom one. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     318 
[8.3.2.2]  Secondary pages  
 
 
 
Figure 8.19. Thumbnails were used in Version 2 of the website to compensate for screen size, 
allowing users to click on the thumbnail to view the posters at full size. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     319 
 
Figure 8.20. Example of the enlarged poster image in Version 2.  
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     320 
[8.3.2.3]  Typography 
Figure 8.21. Headlines on the website were rendered in the font Frankfurter using sIFR, which 
allowed the text to be selected and read by search engines. 
[8.3.3]  User behaviour analysis 
[8.3.3.1]  Navigation and user entry  
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     321 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     322 
Figure 8.22. Before 25 July 2008: ?How breast cancer looks? page with text inline encouraging 
users to expand the thumbnail images. Click rate on the image was 28% on the busiest day of 
traffic (Pageviews: 1,553). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     323 
Figure 8.23. After 25 July 2008: Introduction page to 'signs of breast cancer' with added 
introduction to three key pages. This increased viewing other pages dramatically. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     324 
Figure 8.24. View of ?How breast cancer looks? page with added red text at the top to 
encourage users to click on thumbnail image. Click rate on the thumbnail image was 60% on 
the four busiest days, cumulatively. (Pageviews: 420). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     325 
 
 
 
[8.3.3.2]  Screen size 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     326 
Figure 8.25. Google Analytics statistics showed that visitors had larger screens than the year 
before, indicating there was now more room to design the website. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     327 
[8.3.4]  Conclusion for improvements based on the second version of the 
website 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     328 
[8.4]  Website Version Three: Worldwidebreastcancer.com 
 
[8.4.1]  Version 3 (February 2009 ? March 2010, 13 Months)5 
[8.4.2]  Changes implemented in third version 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     329 
Figure 8.26. Homepage of Version 3 of the worldwide breast cancer site had a simplified top 
navigation to de-clutter the page, putting emphasis on the content. The top image rotated to 
highlight different topics found on the website. Post July, 2009. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     330 
Figure 8.27. Screen shot of the breast cancer map that was developed with CartoSoft as part 
of this doctoral project. This map allowed patients to type in their postcode in the US or 
England to find their nearest breast screening unit (2008). Found at 
http://www.cartosoft.com/lab/worldwidebreastcancer/ 
 
Figure 8.28
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     331 
Figure 8.28. Version 3 of the website displayed posters at a larger size to increase viewing. 
Each section had its own colour scheme and a large footer to encourage exploration. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     332 
Figure 8.29. Information about types of breast cancer and treatment was included in Version 3 
of the website. It was later eliminated due to the focus of the website being adjusted to 
screening and detection specific. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     333 
Figure 8.30. A breast cancer screening pamphlet was added to the 'Goodies' section of the 
site, post July 2008. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     334 
Figure 8.31. The homepage was later simplified to help reduce loading times, and a link to 
print materials included on the footer, post July 2008. 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     335 
Figure 8.32. A rotating image was included on the homepage, covering topics such as risk, 
screening, signs, The Mayor and educational materials, post July 2008. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     336 
[8.5]  Comparative statistical analysis of the website 
 
[8.5.1]  Visitor statistics in three website versions 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
[8.5.1.1]  Traffic analysis 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     337 
Traffic statistics for the three website versions: 
Website Version Unique visitors Number of visits Pages Viewed 
Version 1 Mar 06 ? Sept 07 6397 8913 34887 
Version 2: Oct 07 ? Feb 09 16138 23583 125964 
Version 3: March 09 ? April 2010 19951 40116 126935 
Averages per month: 
v1 (19 mo) 334 469 1836 
v2 (17 mo) 949 1387 7410 
v3 (13 mo) 1534 3085 9764 
 
Table 8.1. Visitor statistics for each website version were collected from the webhost using 
Awstats, and was the most reliable data source compared to Google Analytics that didn't 
collect data until October 2007. 
 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     338 
Figure 8.33. This graph compares Version 3 (blue) with Version 2 (green). Version 2 of the 
website had a higher number of page views and a lower 'bounce rate'. However Version 3 of 
the website increased visitors by 28%.  
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     339 
Figure 8.34. Traffic peaked in October on the website every year (2006-2009).
 [8.5.1.2]  Geographic location 
lemonland.org
 Screen Resolutions Aug 18, 2008 - Apr 6, 2010Comparing to: Site
 0
 100
 200
 0
 100
 200
 Aug 18 Oct 11 Dec 4 Jan 27 Mar 22 May 15 Jul 8 Aug 31 Oct 24 Dec 17 Feb 9 Apr 4
 Visits
 19,468 visits used 197 screen resolutions
 Site Usage
 Visits
 19,468
 % of Site Total:
    100.00%
 Pages/Visit
 3.61
 Site Avg:
    3.61 (0.00%)
 Avg. Time on Site
 00:02:11
 Site Avg:
    00:02:11 (0.00%)
 % New Visits
 89.19%
 Site Avg:
    89.07% (0.13%)
 Bounce Rate
 43.58%
 Site Avg:
    43.58% (0.00%)
 Screen Resolution Visits Visits
 1024x768 5,922 30.42%
 1280x800 4,507 23.15%
 1280x1024 2,308 11.86%
 1440x900 1,596 8.20%
 1680x1050 1,121 5.76%
 800x600 616 3.16%
 1366x768 473 2.43%
 1920x1200 459 2.36%
 1152x864 443 2.28%
 1280x768 331 1.70%
 320x396 188 0.97%
 1280x960 161 0.83%
 1024x600 151 0.78%
 1280x720 133 0.68%
 1400x1050 118 0.61%
 1920x1080 84 0.43%
 1600x900 78 0.40%
 1024x640 68 0.35%
 1600x1200 66 0.34%
 1152x720 54 0.28%
 1360x768 45 0.23%
 1024x819 30 0.15%
 Visits
 30.42%
 23.15%
 11.86%
 8.20% 5.76%
 8.69%
 1 Google Analytics
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     340 
 
Figure 8.35. List of the top 16 most popular countries that visited the breast cancer website from 
October 2007 ? April 2010. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     341 
 
 Table 8.2. Incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer per country (CRUK, 2009). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     342 
[8.5.1.3]  How visitors found the website 
Figure 8.36. User data showed the sources of visitor traffic, which indicated the route of entry. 
The top ten ?referrers? are shown here, with 55% of visitors locating the website through a 
search engine. Note: Todderplanet was a breast cancer patient who blogged about breast 
cancer.
 lemonland.org
 All Traffic Sources Oct 18, 2007 - Apr 6, 2010Comparing to: Site
 0
 400
 800
 0
 400
 800
 Oct 22 Jan 12 Apr 3 Jun 24 Sep 14 Dec 5 Feb 25 May 18 Aug 8 Oct 29 Jan 19
 Visits
 All traffic sources sent 25,485 visits via 448 sources and mediums
 Site Usage
 Visits
 25,485
 % of Site Total:
    100.00%
 Pages/Visit
 3.79
 Site Avg:
    3.79 (0.00%)
 Avg. Time on Site
 00:02:09
 Site Avg:
    00:02:09 (0.00%)
 % New Visits
 89.35%
 Site Avg:
    89.24% (0.13%)
 Bounce Rate
 40.46%
 Site Avg:
    40.46% (0.00%)
 Source/Medium Visits Visits
 google / organic 10,115 39.69%
 (direct) / (none) 3,274 12.85%
 toddlerplanet.wordpress.com / referral 1,352 5.31%
 bing / organic 1,290 5.06%
 yahoo / organic 1,032 4.05%
 msn / organic 1,009 3.96%
 lemonland.org / referral 653 2.56%
 images.google.com / referral 650 2.55%
 live / organic 517 2.03%
 stumbleupon.com / referral 509 2.00%
 Visits
 39.69%
 12.85%
 5.31%
 5.06% 19.95%
 1 - 10 of 448
 1 Google Analytics
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     343 
[8.5.1.4]  Keywords used by visitors 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 8.37. This chart reports the most used phrases typed into search engines in order to 
find the website, from October 2007 ? April 2010.
 lemonland.org
 Keywords Oct 18, 2007 - Apr 6, 2010Comparing to: Site
 0
 35
 70
 0
 35
 70
 Oct 22 Jan 12 Apr 3 Jun 24 Sep 14 Dec 5 Feb 25 May 18 Aug 8 Oct 29 Jan 19
 Visits
 Search sent 14,402 total visits via 4,471 keywords
 Site Usage
 Visits
 14,402
 % of Site Total:
    56.51%
 Pages/Visit
 3.19
 Site Avg:
    3.79 (-15.77%)
 Avg. Time on Site
 00:01:56
 Site Avg:
    00:02:09 (-9.89%)
 % New Visits
 91.55%
 Site Avg:
    89.24% (2.59%)
 Bounce Rate
 46.11%
 Site Avg:
    40.46% (13.97%)
 Keyword Visits Pages/Visit Avg. Time on
 Site
 % New Visits Bounce Rate
 what does breast cancer feel like 825 2.88 00:01:48 91.39% 51.88%
 what does breast cancer look like 771 2.61 00:01:07 96.50% 55.51%
 breast cancer statistics worldwide 615 2.33 00:02:39 87.97% 50.57%
 signs of breast cancer 313 4.53 00:02:30 96.17% 20.45%
 breast cancer world statistics 303 2.34 00:02:24 89.77% 46.20%
 breast cancer worldwide 277 3.26 00:02:29 85.92% 46.21%
 world breast cancer statistics 227 2.57 00:02:03 85.02% 52.42%
 breast cancer pamphlets 215 3.98 00:02:41 92.09% 36.74%
 worldwide breast cancer 192 8.22 00:04:19 61.98% 30.73%
 breast cancer risk calculator 174 2.06 00:00:31 90.80% 57.47%
 1 - 10 of 4,471
 1 Google Analytics
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     344 
[8.5.1.5]  Screen size 
Figure 8.38. This is a comparison of user screen sizes, with the screens on top being the most 
prevalent size. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     345 
[8.5.2]  Conclusion of requirements for a future website version based on 
user behaviour of all three versions 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     346 
[8.6]  Prototyping the Future Website 
 
[8.6.1]  Paper prototyping 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     347 
Figure 8.39. This is the paper prototype used to assess how people would use the website 
prior to programming a working site (2010). 
 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     348 
Figure 8.40. Users would point at parts of the image and state what they thought that action 
would provide. In this second interface, users often said that clicking on the lemons would 
bring up specific information about that symptom, which was not an originally anticipated 
feature of the website. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     349 
Figure 8.41. The first interface prototype was annotated immediately after the user feedback 
was given. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     350 
Figure 8.42. Post-it notes reflected user feedback that the lemons should be 'clickable' to 
reveal more information. 
[8.6.2]  Refined design after paper prototyping 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     351 
Figure 8.43. Refined interface design for a future version of the website (2010). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     352 
Figure 8.44. Annotated interface outlined technical and visual features for the future website 
(2010). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     353 
[8.6.3]  Mobile version for smartphones 
Figure 8.45. Screenshot of the mobile prototype of the Worldwidebreastcancer.com website. 
The first screen would offer the viewer a list of categories to browse, with options for 
participating in the website remaining at the bottom of the screen (2010). 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     354 
Figure 8.46. This screenshot illustrates what a viewer would see after selecting the 
'symptoms' category, revealing a list of questions on the subject to expand. 
Figure 8.47. This screenshot illustrates what the viewer would see when the first 'symptoms' 
question is expanded for further view. The expanded page is identical to the website page 
seen in Figure 8.43, with the exception of navigation. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     355 
Figure 8.48. To allow users to browse in other categories, 'more' is placed next to the current 
category. This follows the navigation of other Google mobile web versions, such as Google 
Reader, which provides a pop-up list of other categories to browse without having to return to 
the home menu. 
Figure 8.49. This screenshot illustrates how viewers would be able to view a slideshow of the 
posters on the website for a more visually based browsing experience. The images would be 
able to be enlarged through the iPhone magnification gesture and explored in further detail. 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     356 
[8.6.4]  Summary and conclusion for website version four 
Chapter Eight: Realising the Website     357 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.  Conclusion & Reflection 
 
 
 
 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     359 
[9.1]  Original Contributions  
[9.1.1]  Cognitive discoveries 
[9.1.2]  Emotional discoveries 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     360 
[9.1.3]  Physical discoveries 
[9.2]  Original Contributions to the Field of Visual Design  
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     361 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     362 
? 
[9.3]  Key Aims and Reflections 
 
[9.3.1]  Save lives  
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     363 
[9.3.2]  Demonstrate necessity and value of design in patient interactions 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     364 
[9.3.3]  Create patient-centred materials that overcome barriers 
[9.4]  Generalisability and Future Recommendations 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     365 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     366 
? 
? 
? 
? 
[9.5]  Implications for Design Practice and Pedagogy 
[9.6]  Conclusion 
Chapter Nine: Conclusion & Reflection     367 
 
 
 
 
Bibliography 
 
369 
Breast Cancer & Medicine 
370 
 
371 
372 
373 
374 
 
Health Literacy, Patient Communication  
& Patient Engagement 
375 
376 
377 
378 
 
Design Thinking, Human Centred Design, Systems Analysis 
& Related Methodology 
379 
380 
381 
 
382 
383 
Cognitive & Visual Psychology 
384 
 
385 
Online Media & Health Information 
386 
 
Breast Cancer Materials, Medical Illustration Sources  
& Campaigns 
387 
 
Interviews & Feedback 
388 
 
 
 
 
Appendix 
 
2 
Appendix  
Table of Contents 
A. Three phases of design and research in this project   p. 3 
B. Survey 1: Patient Knowledge      p. 6 
C. Survey 2: Results of Visual Interpretation of Symptoms  p. 26 
D. Survey 3: Raw Data For Patient Knowledge Follow-up  p. 32 
E. Survey 4: Raw Data For Visual Interpretation Follow-up  p. 40 
F. Website feedback from a cancer radiologist    p. 60 
G. History of text changes to the breast cancer leaflet   p. 64 
H. Interview with mammography technicians    p. 67 
I. Website development timeline      p. 70 
J. Comments from web visitors      p. 71 
K. Copy of ethics letter from university ethics committee  p. 76 
L. Agreement for using the materials by third parties   p. 77 
 
3 
[A]  Three phases of design and research in this project
  
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
4 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
5 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
? 
6 
[B]  Survey 1: Patient Knowledge 
Welcome to the Worldwide Breast Cancer Survey:  
"Are you Breast Cancer Aware?"  
 
This survey has 20 questions, and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. Filling out this survey will help 
educators learn what information is being understood correctly, and which information needs to be 
brought to the public better.  
 
For this survey to be accurate, do not look up the answers to the questions online during the quiz. 
Otherwise, this would be a survey of how good your web hunting skills are. :) At the end of the quiz, 
you will be taken to a page with answers to each question.  
 
Thank you for your help and participation to help breast cancer education and awareness. Let's begin! 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
[C]  Survey 2: Results of Visual Interpretation of Symptoms
 Want to fight breast cancer today? 
Take 5 minutes to answer this quiz and make a difference! 
 
I want to know what words you think describe each sign of breast cancer in the poster below. 
Write down whatever comes to mind! 
 
The answers will be used to see if the images in this poster 
are communicating correctly to different types of people, 
and that includes you! 
 
The answers will be used to make improvements or to verify the accuracy of the image. 
All responses will be anonymised for publication. 
 
Thanks for your help in improving breast cancer awareness!  
 
Sincerely, The Mayor 
 
Take a few minutes to compare the lemons, then tell me what sign you think 
each are describing by writing your answer in each question's box.  
It is okay to use several words to describe an image if needed. 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32 
[D]  Survey 3: Raw Data For Patient Knowledge Follow-up 
Thank you for taking this survey on breast cancer awareness in the UK. All results will be kept 
anonymous, and your time in helping improve breast cancer awareness is very much appreciated! 
 
The survey takes about 5 minutes to complete in total. Make sure to note if questions allow for multiple 
answers. 
 
My contact information is included in this email if you have any questions or concerns. 
33 
34 
35 
36 
37 
38 
39 
40 
[E]  Survey 4: Raw Data For Visual Interpretation Follow-up 
Introductory letter to participants: 
Thank you very much for offering to participate in this breast cancer awareness survey. All 
information you supply will be anonymous and kept confidential. It is also voluntary.  
 
This survey is 20 questions long and will take 5-10 minutes to complete. You will be asked to look 
at a few images then give your feedback. It's that simple. 
 
You will not be able to go back to previous pages in this survey, so make sure that you are 
satisfied before moving to the next page. There will also be a space to leave comments at the 
end of the survey. 
 
Thank you for your participation. Please feel free to email this survey on to a friend as well! 
 
Corrine Beaumont, PhD Student 
Buckinghamshire New University 
41 
42 
43 
44 
45 
46 
47 
48 
49 
50 
51 
52 
53 
54 
55 
56 
57 
58 
59 
60 
[F]  Website feedback from a cancer radiologist 
61 
62 
63 
64 
[G]  History of text changes to the breast cancer leaflet 
65 
66 
67 
[H]  Interview with mammography technicians 
68 
69 
70 
[I]  Website development timeline 
71 
[J]  Comments from web visitors 
72 
73 
74 
75 
76 
[K]  Copy of ethics letter from university ethics committee 
77 
[L] Agreement for using the materials by third parties 
AGREEMENT: 
1) All credit lines must stay in place on the materials. 
2) Do not change any content or images. (If there is something that you feel needs 
changed on the pamphlet, let me know and I'll make the changes.)  
3) This is to be used for a one-time campaign reaching less than 2500 people, 
personalized for one organization. If you would like to use this for an additional 
purpose, or again in the future, it will have to be repurchased. 
4) This will only be used by your organization and this press file will not be given to 
others. All uses should be inline with the Creative Commons attribution, no 
derivatives, non-commercial guidelines (creativecommons.org). 
5) The designer is not liable for the use or misuse of information contained or omitted 
in these materials. 
  
*By downloading these files attached you agree to these guidelines. Thanks!