Using clustered data to develop biomass allometric models: The consequences of ignoring the clustered data structure.
Dutcă, Ioan, Stăncioiu, Petru Tudor, Abrudan, Ioan Vasile and Ioras, Florin (2018) Using clustered data to develop biomass allometric models: The consequences of ignoring the clustered data structure. PloS one, 13 (8). e0200123. ISSN 1932-6203
|
Text
17573_Dutca_I.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates the consequences of ignoring the clustered data structure on allometric models. Clustered data, in the form of multiple trees sampled from multiple forest stands is commonly used to develop biomass allometric models. Of 102 reviewed papers published between 2012 and 2016 that reported biomass allometric models, 84 (82%) have used a clustered sampling design. However, in as many as 80% of these, the clustered data structure was ignored, potentially violating the independence assumption in ordinary least squares methods. The consequences of ignoring clustered data structure were empirically validated using two clustered biomass datasets (of 110 and 220 trees, with the cluster size of 5 and 10 trees respectively). We showed that when Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was higher than zero, ignoring the clustered data structure returned underestimated standard errors, affecting further the confidence interval and t-test results. The underestimation level depended on ICC (which shows the variance proportion that was caused by the forest stand) and on cluster size (the number of trees sampled from one forest stand). We also showed that using first-order autocorrelation tests, such as the traditional Durbin-Watson statistic, to detect the autocorrelation due to clustered structure could be misleading as the test may show lack of autocorrelation even though ICC is different from zero. In conclusion, when ICC is higher than zero, ignoring the clustered data structure yields over-confident biomass predictions (due to underestimated confidence interval) and/or incorrect research conclusions (due to overestimated evidence against null hypothesis in t-test). Therefore, using a modelling approach that accounts for the hierarchical structure of the data is highly recommended when any form of clustering can be identified, even if the autocorrelation is not significant.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | ** From PubMed via Jisc Publications Router. ** History: received 15-05-2017; accepted 20-06-2018. |
| SWORD Depositor: | JISC Router |
| Depositing User: | JISC Router |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2018 09:24 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2022 07:53 |
| URI: | https://bnu.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17573 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |